The convergence properties of the line transfer tests presented here are shown
in Figs. 7-10. In each
figure, we show the convergence rates, as measured by the relative corrections
per iteration, for a number of test runs. In all tests show here we have used
points and
solid angle points for the
3D test case and 64 radial points for the 1D comparison test. The iterations
were started with
at all spatial points, this initial guess causes
a relative error of about
in
at the outer zones for the case with
and about
in
at the outer zones for the case
with
. The plots show that the
iteration is
useless even for the relatively benign case of
. The
operator splitting method delivers much larger corrections and is substantially
accelerated by the Ng method, similar to the results shown in Paper I. The
nearest-neighbor operator gives substantially better convergence rates than
the diagonal operator, cf. Fig 7, for the test
cases with with
the convergence behavior of the diagonal
operator is unstable, the corrections tend to show oscillations. The nearest-neighbor
operator shows stable convergence with quickly declining corrections for
all test cases, its convergence rate can be accelerated with Ng's method.
The total number of iterations required for the nearest-neighbor operator
is essentially identical to the 1D case with a tri-diagonal operator.
![]() |
![]() |
FS+
![]() |
FS+OS step |
128 | 1 | 3018 | 1143 |
64 | 2 | 2595 | 1072 |
32 | 4 | 2340 | 1032 |
16 | 8 | 2308 | 1018 |
8 | 16 | 2264 | 1052 |
4 | 32 | 2318 | 1054 |