Next: Convergence
Up: Application examples
Previous: LTE tests
We have run a number of test calculation similar to the LTE case but with line
scattering included. In Fig. 3 we show the results for
and in Fig. 4 we show the results
for
as examples. In both cases, the dynamical ranges of
are much larger than in the LTE case. The 3D calculations compare very
well to the 1D calculations, in particular in the outer zones. In the inner
parts the resolution of the 3D models is substantially lower than for the 1D
models, therefore the differences are largest there. In
Figs. 3 and 4 we show the
results for a test model with a grey temperature structure. In these models,
the 3D spatial grid was substantially larger (
) in order to help
resolve the inner regions where the temperature gradients are very large. As
expected, the agreement is not as good in the inner regions as in the models
with a constant temperature, however, the models agree very well in the outer
regions. Overall, the agreement is very similar in quality compared to the case
with constant temperatures. The differences in the mean intensity
between the 1D comparison case and the 3D case is several per-cent in the innermost
layers where the grid of the 3D case is under-sampled, the differences are
below 0.1% in the outer zones.
Next: Convergence
Up: Application examples
Previous: LTE tests
Peter Hauschildt
2008-08-05